tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-82471087299820097522024-02-20T12:29:02.736-08:00Bioethics MidtermHeatherhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/04206556064179562310noreply@blogger.comBlogger3125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8247108729982009752.post-87177719293134895732013-03-09T22:01:00.001-08:002013-03-09T22:01:38.796-08:00Part 3! The Finale!<br />
<div class="MsoNormal">
There are so many examples of times where religious/personal
beliefs have to be taken into consideration, typically in life or death
scenarios. A patient’s right to make these decisions always trumps the
professionals desire to help. But what about those scenarios that happen right
in the doctor’s office? Telling someone they are pregnant and they react badly,
or having to explain to someone the side effects of a drug that could be life
altering are both situations where the patient’s beliefs need to be taken into
account. The professional cannot simply assume that abortion is a solution or
that the side effects of a drug are worth sacrificing a way of life. <o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
It is perfectly acceptable to be without faith, to not
understand why people believe the way they do, or to not be able to relate your
beliefs to others. It is part of our rights in America. But as a professional,
I believe part of our job is to communicate the needs of the patient in a way
that does the best good, or that does the least harm. It is our obligation to
our community to take into account their beliefs on a level that does not
discriminate. <o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
From patient to medical professional, my experience (small
town experience anyway) has shown the communication is so much better if each
can be open about their own faith. To be able to talk about what is going on
and level about what you “believe” leaves less of a gap for science to scare
the public. One of the best experiences I have had was from a patient point of
view. <o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
After a near fatal car crash, my faith was all but crushed.
Yet, my doctor, <a href="http://www.benchmarkpt.com/"> physical therapist</a>, specialist, and my orthopedist always took
into account my belief that my life was meant to be saved and treated it as
such. I was able to ask questions about how they felt about the technology that
was now a part of me that I didn't consider “god given.” It was those
discussions that encouraged me to want to become a medical professional. To
rely on my faith to get me through the good and bad, to help me communicate our
need for advancement in the medical field, and to help understand my patient’s
need on a better level.</div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<br /></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<iframe allowfullscreen='allowfullscreen' webkitallowfullscreen='webkitallowfullscreen' mozallowfullscreen='mozallowfullscreen' width='320' height='266' src='https://www.youtube.com/embed/Cpc-t-Uwv1I?feature=player_embedded' frameborder='0'></iframe></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
This video is Tony Robbins talking about being emotionally involved in what you do (STRONG paraphrasing)! He ends with "explore your web, the [stuff] that's controlling you, so you can give and appreciate what drives other people." It made me think of my Physical Therapists who reminded me of that everyday. I see a direct relationship in being emotionally involved as a medical professional and being aware of the patients beliefs/faith/religion/EMOTION!</div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
My physical therapist loved this old Zen master quote, “A
strategy of detachment may not serve you well in the long run. There are indeed
rewards for those who care for the dying, but you must be present to win them."</div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<o:p></o:p></div>
Heatherhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/04206556064179562310noreply@blogger.com1tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8247108729982009752.post-51714398669534880532013-03-09T16:52:00.001-08:002013-03-09T16:52:44.528-08:00Part 2!<br />
<div class="MsoNormal">
So today is about the patient and medical professional! I
left off yesterday with a question about how the medical professional should go
about bringing religion/faith into their everyday patient communication.
Actually many medical schools require a medical student to take some sort of
course revolved around “spiritual history.” It simply gives the student the
means and education to assess how or whether or not they should invite religion
into their communication with the patient. More recently, Medical Universities
are offering “spirituality in medicine” classes. For example, <a href="http://depts.washington.edu/bioethx/topics/spirit.html#ques6">University of Washington (Medicine)</a> offers course for the purpose of providing an opportunity
for interactive learning about relationships between spirituality, ethics and
health care. Here are some of the goals of the class:<o:p></o:p></div>
<ul style="margin-top: 0in;" type="disc">
<li class="MsoNormal">To
heighten student awareness of ways in which their own faith system
provides resources for encounters with illness, suffering and death.<o:p></o:p></li>
<li class="MsoNormal">To
foster student understanding, respect and appreciation for the
individuality and diversity of patients' beliefs, values, spirituality and
culture regarding illness, its meaning, cause, treatment, and outcome.<o:p></o:p></li>
<li class="MsoNormal">To
strengthen students in their commitment to relationship-centered medicine
that emphasizes care of the suffering person rather than attention simply
to the pathophysiology of disease, and recognizes the physician as a
dynamic component of that relationship.<o:p></o:p></li>
<li class="MsoNormal">To
facilitate students in recognizing the role of the hospital chaplain and
the patient's clergy as partners in the health care team in providing care
for the patient.<o:p></o:p></li>
<li class="MsoNormal">To
encourage students in developing and maintaining a program of physical,
emotional and spiritual self-care which includes attention to the purpose
and meaning of their lives and work.<o:p></o:p></li>
</ul>
<div class="MsoNormal">
The emphasis on listening to the patient and learning of the
patient's beliefs and values as well as the signs and symptoms of illness is
timely. Both play a critical part in the medical professional-patient
relationship. <o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
During my shadowing of Dr. Adams (Shelbyville, TN), I
noticed a whole slew of various persons come through her office. Although they
were treated individually, one of her nurse practitioners kept mentioning, “Same
thing, just a different day. You would think by now I could do my job with my
eyes closed.” This does nothing to convince me that the professionals are doing
all they can to relate to the patient as a person, rather than just simply another
problem to fix. These are the types of
problems our demand for speed causes. <o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
A lot of simplistic problems work against the patient’s
need, not all of them being avoidable. The office visit grows shorter as
medical professionals are pushed into statistic of who better based on how many
patients one sees. <a href="http://content.usatoday.com/topics/more+stories/bioethics/2">USA Today</a> terms the physician as the "gatekeeper" in
terms of referral to specialists, diagnostic procedures, or hospitalization
decisions. This is all projected on the physician from an economy basis. However,
an economy boost should not come at the sacrifice of respect for persons, the fundamental
moral obligation in the profession of medicine. <o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
From the patient point of view, these problems are only
complicated by a slew of rising ethical questions concerning the medical field’s
process of coming up with new technologies or medicine to help the patient. Not
only is there a lack of communication in the office but there are a mass of
medical journals being morally questioned. Without the patient being able to
ask their own doctor about the conflict, what else can they do but look into the
bias of the publicity world? <o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<a href="https://twitter.com/glenn_mcgee">Glenn McGee</a> touches on so many areas of the medical world
that are being questioned with good reason. A great advancement such as
<a href="http://biomed.brown.edu/Courses/BI108/2006-108websites/group09artificialblood/Pages/polyheme.htm">Polyheme</a> is being squandered under the moral criticism of the company
that created it. <a href="http://www.drugs.com/seasonale.html">Seasonale</a> helps the female body from experiencing what can be
a very chronic issue with menstruation. Yet, both of the products are feared
because of the media and the medical profession’s inability to communicate a
code of moral obligation whether it be their own faith or their respect for the
patients faith. McGee goes from clinical trials to genomic baby production, and
I see one outlying case question: where are the morals being taken into
consideration? For me, all that starts in the medical professional’s office.
Talking about it helps, truth be told!<o:p></o:p></div>
Heatherhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/04206556064179562310noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8247108729982009752.post-3489825229289600862013-03-08T13:27:00.000-08:002013-03-08T13:27:27.021-08:00Part 1!<a href="http://content.usatoday.com/communities/religion/post/2009/07/68494139/1#.UTpFaRyG3Ns">Benedict gives Obama some life lessons -- literally!</a><br />
<br />
The above link is a good place to start with Religion in Medicine. What does it mean? Who does this concern? Why is it important to tackle such a personal topic?<br />
Pope Benedict simply lets the President know his opinion on where he is allowing the science/medicine to venture. Most of the article is irrelevant but I was fascinated that this was a topic under religion in Bioethics.<br />
So, I began to think about what kind of professional I want to be described as? How much of that description is directly related to my faith? The link simply reminded me of how important it is to at least be aware of the religiosity in such a influential field.<br />
<br />
So my first objective is to explain the regulations and code of ethics pertaining to Faith/Religion in Medicine. Then, I want to address two sides of how religion affects Medicine, from the patient and from the professional. This blog is dedicated to providing the reasoning behind why it is so important to be aware (religious or not) of the role religion/faith plays in medicine.<br />
<br />
Modern medicine raises an anomaly of grey area. Should we or not lengthen life through artificial means?Is it acceptable to shorten life or dull the exposure of life through the use of pain medications? What is the expanse on how far a person can go to render a disease? This is but a fraction of the myriad of questions that have religious and spiritual significance to a large host of our society. These decisions deserve a sensitive yet direct approach. How can one's faith be taken into account if it is not acknowledged? And at what point does a professional know that faith is playing a role in the patients decision?<br />
<br />
Below I have included the guidelines a medical professional must abide by when dealing with the religious aspect of their duty.<br />
<br />
Four guidelines are offered for physicians regarding
religious issues:<br />
<br />
<div class="MsoNormal">
<o:p></o:p></div>
<ul style="margin-top: 0in;" type="disc">
<li class="MsoNormal">physicians
may enter such a dialogue, but they are not obligated to do so.<o:p></o:p></li>
<li class="MsoNormal">the
dialogue must be at the invitation of the patient, not imposed by the
physician.<o:p></o:p></li>
<li class="MsoNormal">physicians
must be open and nonjudgmental in claiming that their beliefs are
personally helpful, without claiming ultimate truth<o:p></o:p></li>
<li class="MsoNormal">the
guiding principle should be "do no harm," the purpose of the dialogue
should be burden-lifting, not burden-producing. [1]</li>
</ul>
<div>
So for now, I leave you with this question: How can a professional assess when faith is pertinent to the patient if they are not allowed to bring it up? Or course, as you may assume, their are guidelines for that as well! </div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
1. Foster DW. Religion and Medicine: The Physician's
Perspective. Health/Medicine and the Faith Traditions. Marty, M.E., Vaux, K.L.,
editors, Philadelphia, Fortress Press, 1982, pp. 245-270.<o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<br /></div>
Heatherhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/04206556064179562310noreply@blogger.com0