So today is about the patient and medical professional! I
left off yesterday with a question about how the medical professional should go
about bringing religion/faith into their everyday patient communication.
Actually many medical schools require a medical student to take some sort of
course revolved around “spiritual history.” It simply gives the student the
means and education to assess how or whether or not they should invite religion
into their communication with the patient. More recently, Medical Universities
are offering “spirituality in medicine” classes. For example, University of Washington (Medicine) offers course for the purpose of providing an opportunity
for interactive learning about relationships between spirituality, ethics and
health care. Here are some of the goals of the class:
- To
heighten student awareness of ways in which their own faith system
provides resources for encounters with illness, suffering and death.
- To
foster student understanding, respect and appreciation for the
individuality and diversity of patients' beliefs, values, spirituality and
culture regarding illness, its meaning, cause, treatment, and outcome.
- To
strengthen students in their commitment to relationship-centered medicine
that emphasizes care of the suffering person rather than attention simply
to the pathophysiology of disease, and recognizes the physician as a
dynamic component of that relationship.
- To
facilitate students in recognizing the role of the hospital chaplain and
the patient's clergy as partners in the health care team in providing care
for the patient.
- To
encourage students in developing and maintaining a program of physical,
emotional and spiritual self-care which includes attention to the purpose
and meaning of their lives and work.
The emphasis on listening to the patient and learning of the
patient's beliefs and values as well as the signs and symptoms of illness is
timely. Both play a critical part in the medical professional-patient
relationship.
During my shadowing of Dr. Adams (Shelbyville, TN), I
noticed a whole slew of various persons come through her office. Although they
were treated individually, one of her nurse practitioners kept mentioning, “Same
thing, just a different day. You would think by now I could do my job with my
eyes closed.” This does nothing to convince me that the professionals are doing
all they can to relate to the patient as a person, rather than just simply another
problem to fix. These are the types of
problems our demand for speed causes.
A lot of simplistic problems work against the patient’s
need, not all of them being avoidable. The office visit grows shorter as
medical professionals are pushed into statistic of who better based on how many
patients one sees. USA Today terms the physician as the "gatekeeper" in
terms of referral to specialists, diagnostic procedures, or hospitalization
decisions. This is all projected on the physician from an economy basis. However,
an economy boost should not come at the sacrifice of respect for persons, the fundamental
moral obligation in the profession of medicine.
From the patient point of view, these problems are only
complicated by a slew of rising ethical questions concerning the medical field’s
process of coming up with new technologies or medicine to help the patient. Not
only is there a lack of communication in the office but there are a mass of
medical journals being morally questioned. Without the patient being able to
ask their own doctor about the conflict, what else can they do but look into the
bias of the publicity world?
Glenn McGee touches on so many areas of the medical world
that are being questioned with good reason. A great advancement such as
Polyheme is being squandered under the moral criticism of the company
that created it. Seasonale helps the female body from experiencing what can be
a very chronic issue with menstruation. Yet, both of the products are feared
because of the media and the medical profession’s inability to communicate a
code of moral obligation whether it be their own faith or their respect for the
patients faith. McGee goes from clinical trials to genomic baby production, and
I see one outlying case question: where are the morals being taken into
consideration? For me, all that starts in the medical professional’s office.
Talking about it helps, truth be told!
No comments:
Post a Comment